Vienna 01/28/2025
Entire blog as a free PDF eBook.
Sustainable development – the euphemism that the creators of the UN 2030 Agenda like to use – also applies to demographic issues. How can you present an unpopular concept in such a way that it is widely accepted? Positive-sounding words are used to replace reality with “no alternative” solutions.
In the summer of 1976, Poland was hit by a wave of strikes. At that time I had the opportunity to listen to a speech by a subordinate party leader. We are on the only right path, and unfortunately nothing can be done! Obviously, he too wanted a change! The situation was, as the German Chancellor Angela Merkel used to say later, without alternative. The same lady who issued the slogan: We can do it! and opened the borders to an avalanche of refugees into Europe in 2015.
Who is the creator of this criminal work called replacement migration? The answer is simple and unmistakable. They are the authors of the Great Reset. The authors openly admit it. You can read it in a document published on the UN website in March 2020.
Some still remember the mathematical models from five years ago that predicted an exponential rise in infections with an invented viral threat. The mathematical models themselves were correct – it was the assumptions and unrealistic coefficients that were wrong. An unlimited, unrealistic increase in infections could quickly lead to a paranoid situation where, with 8 billion people on the planet, we would have 800 billion severely contaminated victims. Similarly ridiculous assumptions about demographics can be found in the UN document mentioned above.
he potential support ratio at its 1995 value of 5.2 persons aged 15-64 for each person aged 65 or older. In order to keep the potential support ratio constant at that level, it would be necessary to have 593 million immigrants from 1995 to 2050, an average of 10.8 million per year. By 2050, out of a United States total population of 1.1 billion, 775 million, or 73 per cent, would be post- 1995 immigrants or their descendants.
There are currently around 340 million people living in the United States. The whole debate revolves around the ageing population and the fact that in the near future there will no longer be enough working people to support the number of pensioners, which is growing year on year. It is therefore essential to bring refugees into the country.
The example from Sweden shows how pointless this way of thinking is: immigration from countries with a low level of education – especially from Muslim non-EU countries – is a key factor in this development. Around 54 percent of new arrivals in Sweden can neither read nor write. Source in German. The UN’s analysis also does not address the problem of unemployment that will accompany the introduction of artificial intelligence. The demand for labor – whether skilled or not – will simply decrease.
The problems associated with refugees, both in the countries where these people appear and in their own countries, are not mentioned in the report on replacement migration.
Author of the article: Marek Wojcik
Email: worldscam3@gmail.com
<If you like what I write, it would help a lot to further spread these articles if you share them with your friends on social media.